1 |
# |
# |
2 |
# $Id: v_100.txt,v 3.2 2002/12/05 10:17:42 pamela Exp $ |
# $Id: v_100.txt,v 3.3 2002/12/05 17:27:59 pamela Exp $ |
3 |
# |
# |
4 |
# $Log: v_100.txt,v $ |
# $Log: v_100.txt,v $ |
5 |
|
# Revision 3.3 2002/12/05 17:27:59 pamela |
6 |
|
# New GARFIELD.GAR file added and GPAMELA.FFR cleaned and updated |
7 |
|
# |
8 |
# Revision 3.2 2002/12/05 10:17:42 pamela |
# Revision 3.2 2002/12/05 10:17:42 pamela |
9 |
# Update CAS and CALO geometries and positions. Makefile updated as well |
# Update CAS and CALO geometries and positions. Makefile updated as well |
10 |
# |
# |
25 |
#CMZ : 1.00/01 28/11/95 18.51.23 by Francesco Cafagna |
#CMZ : 1.00/01 28/11/95 18.51.23 by Francesco Cafagna |
26 |
#-- Author : Francesco Cafagna 28/11/95 |
#-- Author : Francesco Cafagna 28/11/95 |
27 |
|
|
28 |
|
9 December 2003, Bari |
29 |
|
|
30 |
|
CALORIMETER SIMULATION completed! The update of the geometry and of the |
31 |
|
special tracking parameters and the tuning of the calorimeter have been |
32 |
|
successfully done. A great quantity of simulated data have been produced |
33 |
|
in the calorimeter for different particles (muons, electrons and pions) |
34 |
|
and momenta (5 and 40 GeV/c) and the output data have been analyzed. The |
35 |
|
distributions of the total energy deposited in the calorimeter and the |
36 |
|
total number of strips hit have been compared with the respective |
37 |
|
distributions produced by the Trieste's tuned standalone Monte Carlo |
38 |
|
simulation program of the PAMELA calorimeter. The accord between the |
39 |
|
two simulations is excellent. Many thanks to Mirko for his collaboration. |
40 |
|
|
41 |
|
Working in progress on TRD. The GARFIELD interface to the HEED program is not |
42 |
|
optimized to track particle with a charge greater than one and photons. The |
43 |
|
program print a warning message to advise the user when it is the case. |
44 |
|
|
45 |
|
18 April 2003, Bari |
46 |
|
|
47 |
|
The buffer size of each column of the GPAMELA Ntuple has been increased to |
48 |
|
4096 and set equal to the record length, defined by a call to the HROPEN |
49 |
|
routine. |
50 |
|
Also the length of the common /PAWC/ (parameter NWPAW) has been increased |
51 |
|
to 1.34E8, according to the rule that it has to be larger than the number |
52 |
|
of columns times the buffer size. |
53 |
|
|
54 |
|
10 April 2003, Bari |
55 |
|
|
56 |
|
The variables in the HIT STRUCTURE of the CALORIMETER and their way to be |
57 |
|
filled have been changed according to the electronics system of the real |
58 |
|
detector. In fact, because each silicon detector (module) consists of |
59 |
|
32 strips and each strip is connected to those belonging to the two detectors |
60 |
|
of the same row (or column) for forming 24 cm long strips, the sum of the |
61 |
|
deposited energies in the strips forming a `long strip' is now calculated for |
62 |
|
each event (gpucal.F subroutine) and it is stored in a hit only at the |
63 |
|
end of the event (gutrev.F subroutine). |
64 |
|
The output variables of the GPAMELA en-tuple are then filled in the vectors |
65 |
|
ICAPLANE(NTHCAL), ICASTRIP(NTHCAL), ENESTRIP(NTHCAL) and ICAMOD(NTHCAL), |
66 |
|
by a call to the GPDCAL subroutine: |
67 |
|
-ICAPLANE(i) contains the number of hit plane; |
68 |
|
-ICASTRIP(i) contains the number of hit strip; |
69 |
|
-ICAMOD(i) can assume different values based on the number of times and |
70 |
|
positions in which a `long strip' has been hit. |
71 |
|
-ENESTRIP(i) contains the deposited energy in the hit strip; |
72 |
|
where i is the number of hit (1<i<4224). |
73 |
|
Note that in the calorimeter each hit is filled at the end of the event and |
74 |
|
that there is a hit for each `long strip' hit from |
75 |
|
the particle. This use of the hit structure is different for the other |
76 |
|
detectors and it has been considered to avoid a too big number of hit in the |
77 |
|
calorimeter due to the showers. Follows that NTHCAL, which is the |
78 |
|
max number of hit in the calorimeter, is equal to 4224, the total |
79 |
|
number of `long strips'. So, for each event, the real number of hit will |
80 |
|
be less or equal to 4224. |
81 |
|
ICAMOD(i) is an additional information that does not exist in the real |
82 |
|
detector: if the strip i (i=1,32) of the module 1 or 2 or 3 |
83 |
|
is hit, the value of ICAMOD(i) is respectively incremented of 1, 100, 10000. |
84 |
|
Analogously it is done, if it is the strip j (j=33,64) of the modules 4, 5 |
85 |
|
and 6 or if it is the strip k (k=65,96) of the modules 7, 8 and 9. |
86 |
|
For example if we consider the hit 1 of an event, we could read: |
87 |
|
ICASTRIP(1)=30, ICAPLANE(1)=21, ENESTRIP(1)=0.5E-03 and ICAMOD(1)=10001. |
88 |
|
It means that the hit 1 contains the information that in the strip 30 of the |
89 |
|
plane 21 has been deposited a total energy of 0.5E-03 GeV. In addition the |
90 |
|
`long strip 30' has been hit two times, one in the first module and the |
91 |
|
other in the third one. |
92 |
|
|
93 |
|
The energy deposited in the calorimeter is calculated in GeV. |
94 |
|
|
95 |
|
To store the hits in the calorimeter the subroutine GSAHIT is used instead of |
96 |
|
GSCHIT. |
97 |
|
|
98 |
|
To retrieve the hit structure the call to the routine GPRHIT is done instead |
99 |
|
of a call to the GFHITS subroutine. |
100 |
|
|
101 |
|
25 February 2003, Bari |
102 |
|
|
103 |
|
BUG found: |
104 |
|
DCUTEAER, DCUTEAL, DCUTECE, DCUTECP, DCUTEFE, DCUTEG10C, DCUTEG10, DCUTEKAP, |
105 |
|
DCUTEN2G, DCUTEROA, DCUTESCIN, DCUTESICA, DCUTETRAD, DCUTEW2, |
106 |
|
DCUTEW, DCUTEXE variables missed in the commons: gpaer.inc, gpal.inc, gpce.inc, |
107 |
|
gpcp.inc, gpfe.inc, gpg10c.inc, gpg10.inc, gpkap.inc, gpn2g.inc, gproa.inc, |
108 |
|
gpscin.inc (obsolete), gpscint.inc, gpsica.inc, gptrad.inc, gpw2.inc, gpw.inc, |
109 |
|
gpxe.inc, gpdaer.inc, gpdal.inc, gpdce.inc, gpdcp.inc, gpdfe.inc, gpdg10c.inc, |
110 |
|
gpdg10.inc, gpdkap.inc, gpdn2g.inc, gpdroa.inc, gpdscin.inc, gpdsica.inc, |
111 |
|
gpdtrad.inc, gpdw2.inc, gpdw.inc, gpdxe.inc. |
112 |
|
They have been added in these commons and they have been initialized in the |
113 |
|
GPSTM subroutine. |
114 |
|
|
115 |
|
Updated the special tracking parameters SICALO, TUNGA, KAOLINITE and G10C |
116 |
|
in the subroutines gpsica.F, gpw2.F, gpw.F, gpce.F and gpg10c.F. They were |
117 |
|
suggested by Mirko Boezio. |
118 |
|
|
119 |
|
Updated the value of the absorption length for silicon in the calorimeter |
120 |
|
and tracker although this parameter is ignored by GEANT. For this reason |
121 |
|
it was equal to the radiation length. |
122 |
|
|
123 |
|
Updated the relative positions of the calorimeter planes. The corrected |
124 |
|
shifting are: |
125 |
|
|
126 |
|
first view: (Dxo,Dyo)=(0.10,0.05) cm |
127 |
|
second view: (Dxo,Dyo)=(-0.05,0.10) cm |
128 |
|
third view: (Dxo,Dyo)=(-0.10,-0.05) cm |
129 |
|
fourth view: (Dxo,Dyo)=(0.05,-0.10) cm |
130 |
|
|
131 |
4 November 2002, Bari |
4 November 2002, Bari |
132 |
|
|
133 |
CAS detectors distances modified |
CAS detectors distances modified |
267 |
|
|
268 |
TRD IONIZATION ENERGY LOSS GENERATED NOW BY GARFIELD |
TRD IONIZATION ENERGY LOSS GENERATED NOW BY GARFIELD |
269 |
To generate the ionization in the TRD straw tubes the HEED program |
To generate the ionization in the TRD straw tubes the HEED program |
270 |
interfaced by GARFIELD is used (GEANT does not simulate the ionization |
interfaced by GARFIELD is used (GEANT does not correctly simulate |
271 |
in thin layer and in the gas, correctly). The idea is that GEANT tracks |
the ionization in thin layer and in the gas). The idea is that GEANT |
272 |
the particle in the gas and then passes the coordinates, translated in |
tracks the particle in the gas and then passes the coordinates, |
273 |
the DRS, to GARFIELD. The GARFIELD subroutines are called by GPUTRD. |
translated in the DRS, to GARFIELD. The GARFIELD subroutines are |
274 |
The energy loss and the number of clusters in TRD are stored in the |
called by GPUTRD. The energy loss and the number of clusters in TRD |
275 |
variables EGARTRD and NGARTRD of the CWN-tplu. |
are stored in the variables EGARTRD and NGARTRD of the CWN-tplu. |
276 |
|
|
277 |
1 May 2001, Bari |
1 May 2001, Bari |
278 |
|
|
351 |
The definition of the ITRSO detector has been changed in the GPSED routine: |
The definition of the ITRSO detector has been changed in the GPSED routine: |
352 |
NVTRD has been forced to 2 for compatibility with GPDTRD. |
NVTRD has been forced to 2 for compatibility with GPDTRD. |
353 |
|
|
|
3 april 2001, Bari |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
354 |
28 march 2001, Bari |
28 march 2001, Bari |
355 |
|
|
356 |
ITRSO has been defined as a sensitive detector in GSTMED routine and it has |
ITRSO has been defined as a sensitive detector in GSTMED routine and it has |