1 |
# |
# |
2 |
# $Id: v_100.txt,v 3.20 2006/11/16 18:45:29 pam-ba Exp $ |
# $Id: v_100.txt,v 3.23 2006/11/30 13:22:35 cafagna Exp $ |
3 |
# |
# |
4 |
# $Log: v_100.txt,v $ |
# $Log: v_100.txt,v $ |
5 |
|
# Revision 3.23 2006/11/30 13:22:35 cafagna |
6 |
|
# *** empty log message *** |
7 |
|
# |
8 |
|
# Revision 3.22 2006/11/28 11:43:41 pam-ba |
9 |
|
# History modified |
10 |
|
# |
11 |
|
# Revision 3.21 2006/11/28 10:26:15 pam-ba |
12 |
|
# S3 positioning completed |
13 |
|
# |
14 |
# Revision 3.20 2006/11/16 18:45:29 pam-ba |
# Revision 3.20 2006/11/16 18:45:29 pam-ba |
15 |
# Simulated an aluminum container for S4 |
# Simulated an aluminum container for S4 |
16 |
# |
# |
85 |
#CMZ : 1.00/01 28/11/95 18.51.23 by Francesco Cafagna |
#CMZ : 1.00/01 28/11/95 18.51.23 by Francesco Cafagna |
86 |
#-- Author : Francesco Cafagna 28/11/95 |
#-- Author : Francesco Cafagna 28/11/95 |
87 |
|
|
88 |
|
1 December 2006, Bari F. Cafagna |
89 |
|
|
90 |
|
NEW TAGGED VERSION: v4r9 |
91 |
|
|
92 |
|
NEW ANTIPROTON ANNICHILATION CROSS SECTION |
93 |
|
|
94 |
|
The new cross section has been added by Sergio Bottai to the geisha code. |
95 |
|
|
96 |
|
30 November 2006, Bari F. Cafagna |
97 |
|
|
98 |
|
NEW TAGGED VERSION: v4r8 |
99 |
|
|
100 |
|
BUG FIXED |
101 |
|
|
102 |
|
For some reason there was a conflict using FLUKA and the GARFILD |
103 |
|
interface for the TRD. The file TRD_ATT.TXT was treated as flukaerr |
104 |
|
file by the compiler. It is not clear why. The code was correct, |
105 |
|
the logical units and names were not inconflict, but the compiler |
106 |
|
assigned to them the same internal number. It may be a problem |
107 |
|
related to the optimization phase. I did close the file just after |
108 |
|
the read-out in GPDAT.F and commented out the closing in UGLAST.F |
109 |
|
|
110 |
|
|
111 |
|
|
112 |
November 2006, Bari |
November 2006, Bari |
113 |
|
|
114 |
|
|
133 |
details of these materials. |
details of these materials. |
134 |
|
|
135 |
TOP PLATE GEOMETRY ADDED. |
TOP PLATE GEOMETRY ADDED. |
136 |
The top plate geometry has been simulated as a N2 box that has the same |
The top plate geometry has been simulated as a rectangular window filled |
137 |
dimensions of CATA. Inside it, at the right positions, there are S2 and CATA. |
with a mixture of titanium (90%), aluminum (6%) and vanadium (4%). It has been |
138 |
The real top plate is a rectangular window having a thickness of 0.5 cm |
put in a N2 box having the same planar dimensions of CATA. In this box there |
139 |
(volume TPTL emptied by the volume TPCV). This volume is filled with a mixture |
are also S2 and CATA at the right positions. Then the top plate geometry has |
140 |
of titanium (90%), aluminum (6%) and vanadium (4%). Other parts of titanium |
been completed with other eight small volumes of titanium positioned at the |
141 |
are the four volumes TPTU, which are positioned at the corners of TPTL at the |
corners of the N2 box. Four of them are at the same height of CATA, the |
142 |
same height of CATA, and the four volumes TPTM, which are positioned at the |
other four are at the same height of S2. The simulated geometry of the top |
143 |
corners of TPTL, at the same height of S2. |
plate is based on a simplified version of the CAD drawings. |
|
The geometry of the top plate is based on a simplified version of the CAD |
|
|
drawings. |
|
144 |
|
|
145 |
October 2006, Bari |
October 2006, Bari |
146 |
|
|